bunchofsite.com bunchofsite.com
   Index Page :> About Us :> Privacy of Info :> ToS :> Add Url :> Submit Article
Search:   

 

Events & News

 

Cooking & Drinking

 

Teens & Kids

 

Automobiles

 

Fitness & Health

 

Healthcare & Medicine

 

Entertainment

 

Realty & Property

 

Companies & Business

 

Computers & Software

 

Games & Play

 

Tour & Travel

 

Society & Issues

 

Fashion & Lifestyle

 

Garden & Home

 

Academics & Learning

 

Jobs & Employment

 

Law & Politics

 

Science & Space

 

Shopping Online

 

Self Management

 

Creative Arts

 

Outdoor & Sports

 

Finance & Banking

 

Index Page › Fitness & Health › Medicine & Medication
 

Benefits From Using An Independent Review Organization (IRO) For Hospital Peer Review Services

 
Author: Skip Freedman

Hospitals that have come to us for the first time for medical peer review services often have cases that have been either in litigation or subject to potential litigation for months if not years. We have been able to quickly help litigation teams and hospital quality managers gain clarity about these situations so they can more easily decide what their next course of action should be. In cases of litigation, if a hospital knows that their physician provider was at fault in a particular situation that leads to a bad outcome or a sentinel event, it makes more sense to settle those cases quickly, rather than incur more legal expenses by continuing to defend themselves.

When hospitals first experience successful case resolution through an outsourced peer review, they begin to believe that outsourcing to an independent review organization can have lasting benefits and should be done on a more systematic basis. Applying best practices and quality management to the process means that an organization is trying to reduce negative patient outcomes and sentinel events and, as a result, it will send a certain percentage its peer review committee cases out to an independent review organization to be looked at. Oftentimes, our clients send us cases in groups where were asked not to look just at bad outcomes.

The bad outcome cases might be interspersed in a larger sampling of cases where nothing went wrong at all, assuring that our peer specialists are getting a representative sampling of cases allowing for a high degree of objectivity in the review. So many hospitals have gone from an initial experience outsourcing a sensitive case to an IRO to using an IRO as a part of an ongoing quality management process. A systematic, proactive approach to sending out sensitive cases has been done for oncology groups, radiology groups and other specialty groups inside hospitals. We also review samplings for other specialty areas including general surgery, orthopedics and neurosurgery-- all with great results. Today outsourced peer review for hospitals and medical groups is rapidly being adopted as a best practice.

Author Bio:
Skip Freedman is a noted author. Skip likes to create articles about this area.
You can search for this article using: the cure, medicine, remedy, medications, acne medicine, medicine cabinets, bad medicine
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Low Carb Diet and Weight Loss
 
Tune Into The 10,000 Years of Exercise History for Ultimate Weight Loss
 
Weight Loss - Necessary or Cosmetic?
 
Fruits for Summer: Summer Skin Care
 
Your Diet Causes Acne - Myth or Reality?
 
How to Overcome Procrastination
 
Drug Detox
 
Eye Care - Macular Degeneration Help
 
Stomach Bacteria That Causes Bad Breath
 
Is Lunesta Safe For You?
 
 
 
Index Page :> Privacy of Info :> ToS
Copyright © 2008 www.bunch-of-sites.com All Rights Reserved.